Dear Roberto Bagnara,
I followed the provided link and downloaded ppl-1.1pre6 version. The compilation was fine and all tests in "make check" passed. The build-up of gcc was successful as well. Thanks for the fast response and kind help!
Dear Marco Bodrato,
Thanks for the notification that solves my confusion!
Best Regards, -- chiahsun
2013/1/4 Roberto Bagnara bagnara@cs.unipr.it
On 01/03/13 12:47, Chia-Hsun Cheng wrote:
2. < Static data member name mismatches > ppl-1.0/src/mp_std_bits.defs.**hh:72 andppl-1.0/src/mp_std_bits.defs.**hh:133 defines static const bool tininess_before = false; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ However, in gmp-5.1.0/gmpxx.h:3302 and gmp-5.1.0/gmpxx.h:3339, there are static const bool tinyness_before = false; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Problem: I am not sure if the two data member are the same. Since I commented out the whole block of numeric_limits in ppl-1.0/src/mp_std_bits.defs.**hh in the last step, the member `tininess_before' cannot be resolved. Fix: Finally, I add static const bool tininess_before = false; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^^^^^ in gmp-5.1.0/gmpxx.h:3303 and gmp-5.1.0/gmpxx.h:3341 and add member initialization const bool numeric_limits<T>::tininess_**before; \ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ in gmp-5.1.0/cxx/limits.cc:47 and rebuild the gmp library. So, for PPL library, even if the code for numeric_limits is commented out, the declarations and object code can be found from GMP library.
Dear Chia-Hsun,
Marco Bodrato (thanks Marco!) made me notice I overlooked this part of your message. Indeed this is a bug in the PPL: the right spelling is `tinyness_before' as correctly written in GMP. I have just fixed the Git version of the PPL and a new PPL 1.1 snapshot release will soon be added to the location I already indicated.
Kind regards,
Roberto-- Prof. Roberto Bagnara
Applied Formal Methods Laboratory - University of Parma, Italy mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it BUGSENG srl - http://bugseng.com mailto:roberto.bagnara@**bugseng.comroberto.bagnara@bugseng.com