
On 01/22/13 10:26, Albert Cluster wrote:
Hi Roberto, Thank you a lot for your advices.
I'm not familiar with signatures, but here is what I did (I tested that procedure on several other versions, but none worked...)
silvere@silvere-Linux:~/dev/src$ wget http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/pgp_public_key silvere@silvere-Linux:~/dev/src$ ls MD5SUMS pgp_public_key ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2 ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2.sign ppl-0.11.2.tar.lzma silvere@silvere-Linux:~/dev/src$ gpg --import pgp_public_key gpg: key 517D0F0E: "Linux Kernel Archives Verification Key <ftpadmin@kernel.org mailto:ftpadmin@kernel.org>" not changed gpg: key B5944392: "Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@cs.unipr.it mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it>" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 2 gpg: unchanged: 2 silvere@silvere-Linux:~/dev/src$ gpg --verify ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2.sign ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2 gpg: Signature made Sun 27 Feb 2011 09:57:07 GMT using DSA key ID B5944392 gpg: BAD signature from "Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@cs.unipr.it mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it>" silvere@silvere-Linux:~/dev/src$
What do you think I did wrong ?
Nothing, as far as I can see. But please let me have also the output of `ls -l' and (after downloading the MD5SUMS) the result of `md5sum --check MD5SUMS'. Here is what I get:
$ wget -q ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/releases/0.11.2/ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2 $ wget -q ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/releases/0.11.2/MD5SUMS $ wget -q ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/releases/0.11.2/ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2.sign $ ls -l total 12068 -rw-rw-r-- 1 roberto roberto 208 Jan 22 11:51 MD5SUMS -rw-rw-r-- 1 roberto roberto 12348525 Jan 22 11:49 ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 roberto roberto 198 Jan 22 11:52 ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2.sign $ md5sum --check MD5SUMS ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2: OK md5sum: ppl-0.11.2.tar.gz: No such file or directory ppl-0.11.2.tar.gz: FAILED open or read md5sum: ppl-0.11.2.tar.lzma: No such file or directory ppl-0.11.2.tar.lzma: FAILED open or read md5sum: ppl-0.11.2.zip: No such file or directory ppl-0.11.2.zip: FAILED open or read md5sum: WARNING: 3 listed files could not be read $ gpg --verify ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2.sign ppl-0.11.2.tar.bz2 gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 27 10:57:07 2011 CET using DSA key ID B5944392 gpg: Good signature from "Roberto Bagnara bagnara@cs.unipr.it" ...
Kind regards,
Roberto
2013/1/22 Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@cs.unipr.it mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it>
Hello Albert. On 01/21/13 18:54, Albert Cluster wrote: I know it's not particularly a development issue, but I'm trying to download ppl sources to compile a cross-compilation tool chain but What ever the source I download from the ftp server, i'm not able to extract the source. It says that the file is corrupted. Do you have any idea on how I could solve that issue ? We need more details about what you observe. Here are the result of a small experiment performed just a few minutes ago: $ mkdir /tmp/test $ cd /tmp/test/ $ wget -q ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/__releases/LATEST/ppl-1.0.tar.__bz2 <ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/releases/LATEST/ppl-1.0.tar.bz2> $ wget -q ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/__releases/LATEST/MD5SUMS <ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/releases/LATEST/MD5SUMS> $ md5sum --check MD5SUMS ppl-1.0.tar.bz2: OK md5sum: ppl-1.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory ppl-1.0.tar.gz: FAILED open or read md5sum: ppl-1.0.tar.xz: No such file or directory ppl-1.0.tar.xz: FAILED open or read md5sum: ppl-1.0.zip: No such file or directory ppl-1.0.zip: FAILED open or read md5sum: WARNING: 3 listed files could not be read $ wget -q ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/__releases/LATEST/ppl-1.0.tar.__bz2.sign <ftp://ftp.cs.unipr.it/pub/ppl/releases/LATEST/ppl-1.0.tar.bz2.sign> $ ls -l total 15056 -rw-rw-r-- 1 roberto roberto 194 Jan 22 08:43 MD5SUMS -rw-rw-r-- 1 roberto roberto 15405300 Jan 22 08:43 ppl-1.0.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 roberto roberto 198 Jan 22 08:44 ppl-1.0.tar.bz2.sign $ gpg --verify ppl-1.0.tar.bz2.sign ppl-1.0.tar.bz2 gpg: Signature made Thu Jun 28 13:02:51 2012 CEST using DSA key ID B5944392 gpg: Good signature from "Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@cs.unipr.it <mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it>>" ... To reproduce the last step, please see http://bugseng.com/products/__ppl/download#verification <http://bugseng.com/products/ppl/download#verification> Of course, this only tested the bzip2 tarball. Which is the one you found corrupted? Have a nice day, and thank you for that software. Thanks to you for the report. Kind regards, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory - University of Parma, Italy mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it <mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it> BUGSENG srl - http://bugseng.com mailto:roberto.bagnara@__bugseng.com <mailto:roberto.bagnara@bugseng.com>
PPL-devel mailing list PPL-devel@cs.unipr.it http://www.cs.unipr.it/mailman/listinfo/ppl-devel