[GIT] ppl/w3ppl(master): Mentioned the corrections applied to a couple of ppl_lpsol test files

Module: ppl/w3ppl Branch: master Commit: 20d3d45bcf88187d53e04a060349795332737ad3 URL: http://www.cs.unipr.it/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ppl/w3ppl.git;a=commit;h=20d3d45bcf8...
Author: Enea Zaffanella zaffanella@cs.unipr.it Date: Sat Apr 2 10:36:24 2011 +0200
Mentioned the corrections applied to a couple of ppl_lpsol test files that are required to get a stable behavior across different versions of glpk.
---
htdocs/Bugs/archive.raw | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/Bugs/archive.raw b/htdocs/Bugs/archive.raw index e161f6a..4cd3ce2 100644 --- a/htdocs/Bugs/archive.raw +++ b/htdocs/Bugs/archive.raw @@ -121,6 +121,25 @@ Relevant commit is <A HREF="http://www.cs.unipr.it/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ppl/ppl.git;
<DL>
+<DT><STRONG>January 9, 2010</STRONG></DT> +<DD> +Modified <CODE>ppl_lpsol</CODE> test files <CODE>ex1.mps</CODE> and +<CODE>unboundedmin.mps</CODE> so as to explicitly flag problem variables +to be integer ones. This change allows to obtain a stable output for the +two tests across different versions of <CODE>glpk</CODE>. +The problem was caused by a change of behavior, first occurring in +<CODE>glpk-4.38</CODE>, in the MPS file parsing routines. +For more details, see the mailing list threads +<A HREF="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glpk/2010-01/msg00005.html">[Bug-glpk] Variables erroneously read as binary?</A> +and +<A HREF="http://www.cs.unipr.it/pipermail/ppl-devel/2011-April/017407.html">[PPL-devel] [Fink-devel] ppl-0.10.2 check thorough test fail</A>. + +The two relevant commits are +<A HREF="http://www.cs.unipr.it/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ppl/ppl.git;a=commit;h=97ce932e012943328164d387cfe9a8d2196ca171">97ce932e012943328164d387cfe9a8d2196ca171</A> +and +<A HREF="http://www.cs.unipr.it/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ppl/ppl.git;a=commit;h=56ee86b9ccf001c8dc2ab1558332e9691b2eff3f">56ee86b9ccf001c8dc2ab1558332e9691b2eff3f</A>. +</DD> + <DT><STRONG>August 15, 2009</STRONG></DT> <DD> Fixed a bug whereby <CODE>maximize</CODE> and <CODE>minimize</CODE>
participants (1)
-
Enea Zaffanella