-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: About 'undefined symbol: __gmp_asprintf_memory' Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:18:34 +0800 From: pengyu pengyu@crypto.ee.ncku.edu.tw To: Roberto Bagnara bagnara@cs.unipr.it References: 002901c2a420$cf2fa4b0$8ba3748c@Alan 3DFC685C.9080202@cs.unipr.it

Dear Roberto:

Thank you for your help. I'm sorry it isn't the PLL problem.(I use gmp only) I test the gmp 4.1 in GCC 3.2(OS is Red Hat 8.0), the problem has disappeared. I think the problem is caused by the older version of GCC. In GMP manual, it commend us use GCC 2.9 if we want to use C++ interface supported by GMP. But when I use GCC 2.96, it still has the problem.

pengyu -------------------------------------------- Pengyu Hsieh, Master student Cryptography and Network Security Lab. Department of Electrical Engineering National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----

The original environment: OS: Red Hat 7.2 GCC version is 2.96 GMP version is 4.1

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----

The command I configure it with is as following.(configure GMP) ./configure --enable-cxx

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----

I use the following command to compiler the file.(no warnning, no error) g++ gmp_test.cpp -o gmp_test -lgmpxx

When I execute the executable file. The error message is as following ./gmp_test: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/local/lib/libgmpxx.so.3: undefined symbol __gmp_asprintf_memory

Dear Pengyu,

in order to help you we need some information, such as the version of GMP you are using and the command you used to configure it, the exact compiler version, the system where you are trying to compile the PPL. It would be great if you could, in addition, send us the file "config.log" that you have obtained when configuring the PPL. Please send all the information to ppl-devel@cs.unipr.it and we will do our best in order to help you. Cheers

 Roberto

P.S. Vajirapan solved the problem by correcting a mistake he had done, but I think he didn't tell us which mistake it was.

-- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagnara@cs.unipr.it